Comply with the Law of War Part 4 Reviews
Quick Review 3
19 of 24
&questionText=When is the "superior orders" defense valid in a war crimes trial? Select the best answer.& &lure1=Only when the accused can definitely prove that a commander gave the order to commit a crime.& &lure2=Only when the accused can definitely prove that the commander knew the order was illegal.& &lure3=Only when the accused did not know, or could not have reasonably been expected to know that the act ordered was illegal.& &lure4=Only when the accused knew that the act ordered was illegal and a violation of the Law of War, but committed it anyway.& &correctResponse=3& &correctFeedback=Correct. The superior orders defense is valid only if the accused did not know, or could not have reasonably been expected to know that the act ordered was illegal.& &correctFeedback2=Correct. The superior orders defense is valid only if the accused did not know, or could not have reasonably been expected to know that the act ordered was illegal.& &incorrectFeedback1=Incorrect. Knowledge plays a big part here. Try again.& &failedFeedback=Incorrect, Soldier. The superior orders defense is valid only if the accused did not know, or could not have
reasonably been expected to know that the act ordered was illegal. & &link=i397p0940.html& &attempts=2&